Developer: Treyarch
Publisher: Activision
Genre: Shooter
Sub-Genre: First Person Shooter
Release Date: Nov 17th, 2006
Additonal Info: None
Developer: Treyarch
Publisher: Activision
Genre: Shooter
Sub-Genre: First Person Shooter
Release Date: November 2008
Additonal Info: None
Developer: Sonic Team
Publisher: SEGA
Genre: Shooter
Sub-Genre: First Person Shooter
Release Date: TBA 2008
Additonal Info:
(continued from previous page) ...Duty 4 holds it's own against all other first person shooters out there, and you would be missing out on what may potentially turn out to be the best game of the year if you fail to pick up a copy.
For more information on Call of Duty 4's multiplayer read our other Hands On preview, where we cover both the online multiplayer beta and our first look impressions.
Stay tuned for a full review next month.

Call of Duty 4
Call of Duty 4
Call of Duty 4 Behind the Scenes Multiplayer
Call of Duty 4 Behind the Scenes Multiplayer HD
This game is looking, and sounding amazing! I can't wait for this one to come out.
Amazing game im buying it for sure. But why the PS3 version gotta be down with,graphics and stuff all the time getin really anoyed
i will defenetly get this over haze ... now what system should i buy this for ummm it runs smoother in the 360..
developers wont take the time to make the ps3 version = to pc and 360 versions? if thats true ( must be since we dont get the collectors edition ) then infinity ward developers can go sit on a fat one
WTF!!!! Do devs really hate sony that much???? I am so tired of this ****!!!!
No limited edition and not as smooth as 360!? WTF?!!!!!?!??! I'm getting incredibly sick and tired of this all the time!
Just give it some time guys. Devs need time to unlock the power of the cell. this thing is going to be off the hook in 3 years. cant we all just get along? hug a 360 owner. also, go to their house and see what real gaming is all about.
instead of getting cod4 i'll wait for either haze or ut3. haze is a ps3 exclusive (i think). ut3 is being developed on ps3 (im pretty sure i read that some where). those 2 should be better quality
This game just took a step down on my radar. They probably just ported it over to the PS3.
i dont like the fact that most games on the ps3 lacks of on graphics whats up with that. I have never heard about the xbox 360 games having a bad graphics. Why is that SONY? i thought ps3 was suppose to be the next GEN of gaming meaning that gaming will be like no other and will look soo realistic but it seems like its not like the next GEN...step up your game sony! I know you workin hard and all but come on NEXT GEN means nothing you seen before and if isnt gonna be dat than dont call it next GEN of gaming because when people hear dat they think its going to be a nice experince and want to buy it.......WHO AGREES WITH ME
what happend to the promise of both versions exactly the same?!? GO HAZE!!!
I will definetely be picking this up just hope I can use cover like the enemies do
lazy developers, the PS3 version has awesome graphics, running on a great 60fps but has abit of jaggies on it ONLY because the devs never had the the new SN 2.0 tools. If they had those new tools that Sony finally provided for free. Then...yea lol you get. Xbox 360 and Wii are such CHEAP consoles, its so EASY making games run smooth on them. Now that we have the new SN tools free for all devs and especially those lazy devs. We be getting nonstop high quality games like always. So Microsoft can just cry themselvs to sleep! lol :D
Not cool, its not running as smooth and no limited edition. >_< Any who the backgrounds still look stunning and online muliplayer would probably still kick butt.
I thought IW said that the 360 and PS3 versions would be identical? No LE love either. Such hatred.
we dont need that info man people want to play the game and discover any new stuff by themselfl keep it to yourself dont ruing the hype..
Repeat,this is a recording.Maybe all PS3 owners should just ban buying ported games until these Devs and Sony get their act together.Not going to happen is it?We'll just take it on the chin like we always do and then just keep buying them.What message are we sending if we don't take a harder stand on this bull?By the way,I'm going to buy COD 4 for my PS3.LMAO.I don't really have a choice.
Is this a preview of the "Hands On Edition" of COD4? That's what I thought it was. J/k guys, good laugh though.
I'm really getting tired of this PS3 does not look as good / run as smooth as the PC & 360 version of multiplat titles crap!
U guys are mistaking graphics with jaggyness... They didnt say anything was wrong with the graphics just maybe in certain spots the game may have like a tad of lag, its something that shouldnt really affect you when u play but still no excuse for it being there. Im assuming because this game was prob ported and atm ps3 is kinda hard to work with for most devs that this is the reason why not totally lazy devs but something also I know if they try they can avoid. Also future games should be less problems since sony just relased SN 2.0 tools to make it easier for them.
I was originally planning on buying this...and now I'm not. No way in hel.l. There is absolutely no reason by now developers shouldn't be making a game, especially a massively anticipated game like this, run optimal for both systems. And if was running optimal on both systems, the PS3 version should be 2 times better since the PS3s hardware kicks as.s. Developers in general are starting to get past the point that "it's harder to develop for." It seems like a multi million dollar corporations like Activision and Infinity Ward would be the first to get it right, but obviously not. I'm holding off on this one, I won't support lazy developers in the least. Other multiplatform games that are actually taking advantage of the PS3s hardware to run better on the PS3 *cough* Assassin's Creed*cough* I will actually be supporting. Other than that I have about 5 games I'm getting before 2008. Can't wait. I'm just goona put this one on the trash list.
May find some jaggies on the PS3 version...not as smooth in some areas as you may find on the PC or Xbox 360.
Whats with the "May"s what kind of writer/author/journalist writes may. Do you, or do you not know. You can't put a CON it might be worse in graphics, it might be a little lagger, it might have freaking wings too.
What kind of crappy writing is that? Btw to the idiot above that doesn't know jaggies means a graphicly poor texture base which shows a jaggy line as in no antianalizing, except what doesn't make sense is the devs themselves said AA is in for both Xbox and PS3. So jaggies would be the same for both. I hope nobody lets anyone from this site play a game again. Poor article in length or detail.
Everyone else has said they were equal or PS3 is better.
http://www.dailygame.net/news/archives/006696.php
Thats what a professional article looks like no MAYBEs, cause I'm starting to think this guy MAYBE didn't actually play the game. Maybe doesn't know what hes talking about.
ACTIVISION SUX
point blank...............
So once again ps3 owners are misguided and given the shaft.I thought that the ps3 version was supposed to be superior.Jaggies?WTF this is supposed to be the next generation of gaming.
IF the writer of this article is correct, and the PS3 version does contain the odd jaggy area, then it is down to the developers "that will do" atttiude which to be honest in this day and age JUST WONT do. Fair enough by the sounds of it the reviewer is being very picky and I doubt that it will impede the game in any way but its there, and it shouldnt be.
Ive said it before and i will a million times again. If it wasnt for Sony and their playstation franchise pretty much all games developers wouldnt be half as wealthy as they are. Sony have sold Millions and I mean Millions of games over the last 15 odd years making developers and publishers very rich. So what do these developers now do to repay them? thats right! make half hearted ports for all their loyal fans some of which have supported them for the last 15 years.
I've come to the conclusion that half the people who use this site can't read!
It says there are SOME jaggies on RARE occasions on DISTANT objects - otherwise the game is identical. And in terms of gameplay, it is identical to the 360 version - just as fast and smooth.
The 360's graphics are by ATI, while the PS3's are by nVidia. ATI have for some time had the edge over nVidia when it comes to anti-aliasing. It's exactly the same with their PC graphics cards.
This game IS NOT a 360 port, and has been developed for the PS3 - hence the online has been built especially so that the PS3 version enjoys the same functionality as the 360 gets on Live.
Jesus, try actually READING what is in front of you! You know, just for a change.
Take it as it is, other sites (neutral) say the PS3 version looks slighlty better but runs identically to the 360 version. I doubt the guy here played both versions at the same time to compare graphics/framerates.
A lot of you are assuming he played both versions , plus remeber they would not have been final buils, wait and see, it's one persons opinion which differs from what others have written.
He says " as you may find on the 360" giving the impression he has not played the single player on the 360.
WTF!! this SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ps3 is the is the sickest xbox sucks and cod4 has alot of pros and cons, exxcelent game playstation fan for life