Fine by me, not every game needs multiplayer shoehorned in if they cant make it work without problems in the time alotted.

dont' care just interested in the story

I agree, multiplayer isn't needed if the single-player game is already great.

Well, to me, that's good to hear because they can focus more on the Single Player experience. Not every game needs Online/Multiplayer play, but games that have Online/Multiplayer usually obviously sell better than games that don't have Online. But, the main reason why I play games is for the Story, I don't really care too much for Online or Multiplayer in games.

im glad they arent going to put it in if they cant make it good it if its not going to be of quality dont even bother

Some games don't need multiplayer to be good, like Folklore, still I'm not really convinced about buying this game yet

Hey this is fine by me... multiplayer has always been considered a bonus in my books, but if they can create a solid single-player game then thats all i'm looking for.

this is game still looks wicked i thank i will pick it up. but the dlc later on for multiplayer i doubt it will ever come

 

it's alright we still have MGS4 multiplayer

Damn, no co-op? I was kinda looking forard to that actually.

damn frov we cant play

Good! I think some people and dev's focus too much on MP gameplay. I'd much rather have a really good single player experience than have that "dumbed down" so that the devs could spend time on fitting in a multiplayer experience. If anything I think they should stick to online co-op modes more. I like to play online with people, but not every game. I'd much prefer fewer and better titles both for MP AND SP.

Good to know. I'm with the majority on this. I don't play online, so I had to actually pass up a couple of games because their single player campaigns were more of a tutorial for online, rather than the meat of an actual game. I loved COD4, but I would never spend $60 for a single player experience that is that short. I do plan on getting it, but only when the price warrants the length of play.

If no multiplayer then Sierra should pour all their work into the single player experience.

Exactly what Alpha2 said.  Not every game needs multiplayer.  Bioshock and God of War showed this to us.

I prefer single-player campaigns above all else.  Hopefully co-op is still intact.

Woooo. Games are made to tell stories visually and interactively. If the story isn't good than it's a waste of time in making a game. Go single player!

At least they have the common sense to not do something if you arent going to do it right. Im sure they will have made the right decision in the end

Smart move, it is more important to have quality games/gameplay than simply releasing something that looks good on the first level, but soon realise it's the same throughout the whole game!  Wonder how KillZone2 will turn out as a multiplayer??  Will they "dumb down" the visual quality or be able to keep it like CoD4 has? 

 

And can you imagine DLC MAPS???, they have claimed that each level of the game is 2gigs!!! (not saying the an empty map would take that much, but certainly more than the average shooter!)

excellent...no need to add additional content which would demortalize the essence of the game.  i am fine with just the campaign.

psn id: gingo.... some of the best games so far on ps3 have been released and didn't have multiplayer, so i think this is a good decision as long as they make the single player experience perfect